Interestingly enough, while 67 prices have been quite reasonable of late, some other cameras have been bringing good dollar. To finance some 6x7 purchases, I sold my Mamiya TLR equipment. (I've had some of it for 25 years, and it broke my heart to sell it. But I can't afford to keep everything.) I got $265 for a C220 body and old style 80mm lens and $295 for a late model 250/6.3. I bought the 250 at B&H three or four years ago for $300. (It really hurt to sell that lens. It's a very good piece of glass with a leaf shutter. But I can't afford to keep everything.) With the money I received for the TLR equipment, I was able to buy an MLU 6x7 that I would describe as a nice user, a KEH excellent 150/2.8, a wood grip, and a body cap. Not a bad trade. Paul
Aaron Reynolds wrote: > > On Sunday, December 23, 2001, at 12:16 AM, William Robb wrote: > > > Hey, format wasn't specified...... > > I am pretty fond of the ME Super too. > > I swear, Bill, we have the same cameras. > > I'd put my votes in for the 67 and the ME Super. I love the size, > weight and layout of the ME Super. It's quiet, too. > > I'd say that the 67 merits at least three winks. Especially at the > prices we've seen on eBay in recent days. Why haven't the rest of you > bought 67s yet? > > -Aaron > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
