Sure.  I can use both satisfactorially.  I do see advantages to having
aperture control on the body.  When I get a 67II, I'll forgo it though.

Tom C.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 12:38 PM
Subject: Vs: I love the PZ-1p


> You can do that with MZ-S - if you have not used PZ-1p too much. For us
who have used manual cameras - remember those? - it´s perfectly natural.
> All the best!
> Raimo
> Personal photography homepage at
http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
>
> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: aimcompute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Päivä: 27. joulukuuta 2001 18:24
> Aihe: Re: I love the PZ-1p
>
>
> >I agree 100%.  It is very nice to spin the dials w/o taking the eye from
the
> >viewfinder.
> >
> >The thing this thread is inevitably showing is that our sensory inputs
> >become accustomed to certain stimuli.  We tend to become familiar with a
> >camera body, and then enjoy using it.
> >
> >Tom C.
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Artur Ledóchowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:53 AM
> >Subject: Odp: I love the PZ-1p
> >
> >
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Subject: I love the PZ-1p
> >>
> >>
> >> > Aperture control on the body is MUCH better than using
> >> > the aperture ring on the MZ-S.  This is a BIG problem with the MZ-S
and
> >> zoom
> >> > lenses.  Hyper manual should have been a feature on the MZ-S, in my
> >> opinion.
> >> > Heck...you can even change the aperture on the body of the ZX-7.
> >>
> >> EXACTLY!:) I have the MZ-7 and love the ability to control the aperture
> >from
> >> the body, since it allows me to do every operation without taking my
eye
> >> from the viewfinder. I have everything under control of my index
> >fingers...
> >> That in the MZ-S the Av operates by turning the aperture ring was quite
a
> >> disappointment to me. I've never owed neither a Z-1p nor the MZ-S, but
> >> played with a Z-1 and a Z-50 - I had NO problem with mastering the
control
> >> of them without ANY manual (except for PF's, of course:)).
> >
> ><snip>
> >-
> >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to