Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 3, 2009, at 5:02 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
That's still wrong: Lightroom isn't anything as crude as a piledriver.
No one would reasonably expect to be able to use a piledriver for
tapping little tacks. A reasonable photographer *would* like to be
able to use a tool whose desirable features are raw conversion and
image optimization for... just raw conversion and image optimization.
You still don't get it.
if all you wanted was RAW conversion, use Camera Raw. Lightroom was not
designed for that kind of use. It was designed for end-to-end image
management. That's what makes it efficient.
Except that Camera Raw doesn't work as well. I much prefer Lightroom's
interface and printing options.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
