On Apr 7, 2009, at 11:51 , Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:41:08PM -0400, JC OConnell wrote:
The COC thing is simply how you MEASURE "perceived" depth
of field, no matter what COC or print size you choose, it
I see. So if I don't care whether something is out of focus as long as
it looks like it is in focus, then I can use the aforementioned math?
Of course! We all have many more 4 x 6 prints that are sharp vs the
11 x 14 version.
That's my theory behind the thousands of dog photos in my gallery. 95%
of them are not critically sharp (though it's getting better now that
the sun is out) but I count on the dog owners to have smaller screens
than I, and to only print 4 x 6 from the images they download.
Besides, it's their dog, it's free, so it must be good.
(does away with all the wedding photo terrors)
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
http://web.me.com/jomac/show.me/Blog/Blog.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.