Uh, Cotty, are the criteria drifting a bit as the horrifying prospect of cap mastication looms anew?
It would take a lot of digging through the archives, but as I recall the original criterion was a "truly pro-level" camera, with things like a sealed metal body and 100% viewfinder. I seem to remember your dismissing a 24x36 mm sensor as unnecessary. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW --- On Sat, 4/25/09, Cotty <cotty...@mac.com> wrote: > From: Cotty <cotty...@mac.com> > Subject: Re: Pentax K7 > To: "pentax list" <PDML@pdml.net> > Date: Saturday, April 25, 2009, 7:05 PM > On 25/4/09, Graydon, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >Did you offer to eat your hat if the next Pentax camera > had some > >particular feature, > > 36x24 sensor. > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
