I think most folks are going to continue this sort of "discussion" hoping to be 
convinced they should buy one. Having been convinced, they feel it may be of 
use when their wives launch. It won't be! 8-0

Jack


--- On Sat, 5/9/09, William Robb <war...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: William Robb <war...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: DA* 60-250 at B&H
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Date: Saturday, May 9, 2009, 8:22 AM
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "JC OConnell"
> Subject: RE: DA* 60-250 at B&H
> 
> 
> > Im not pretending they are the exact same thing, its
> just the
> > added features of the 60-250 simply dont even come
> close to adding up to
> > $1200 added value
> > over $139 70-210/4/A lens price to ME. Thats the math
> I did.
> >
> 
> 
> John, why not drop it? It doesn't matter.
> People will buy what they are going to buy.
> Everyone else, why not drop it too?
> This will turn into a 500 post arguement.
> You won't get the last word.
> Been there, done that.
> 
> William Robb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to