I'm with Doug in thinking that this is a good masthead but is too much for a logo. A logo doesn't even need to be one of your photos.
Until I looked I had been worried about directional integrity, so many groupings like this are spoilt by higgledy-piggledy flows of movement within individual pictures that conflict with the overall layout. If your homepage version is more recent than your flickr version (I'm backtracking from Pauls suggestion), then all you need do is flip-flop the flower at top-right so that you have a directional consistency from the centre outwards. As a matter of personal taste I'd be inclined to lose the cat, not because I'm a cat hater (I like them) but because everyone with both a camera and a cat eventually puts a cat-picture on the web. They are a cliche of the age, and say nothing about your professional capability. Put catpix in the body of your website by all means, but not on the masthead or logo. If you plan to do pet portraiture as a business then disregard the preceding rant :-) regards, Anthony "Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight" (Anon) 2009/5/29 Doug Franklin <jehosep...@mindspring.com>: > David J Brooks wrote: >> >> Hopefully it will be smaller when on the site. >> >> Here is try number 3, i';m getting close. >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/3573147749/ > > Personally, I'm thinking this is more of a mission statement than a logo. > :-) If it were me, I'd look for something more compact to use for a logo > and use this image as more like a masthead or something. > > -- > Thanks, > DougF (KG4LMZ) > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.