IMO the low light condition is the only situation where the MZ-S is inferior compared to the LX. It can be argued that the integrated direct metering OTF during exposure is better when the light changes during long night exposure if e.g.. a car with lights on drives in the picture but IMO the image will be ruined anyway. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen
-----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 13. tammikuuta 2002 18:11 Aihe: Re: Re[6]: getting LX - worth it? (repairs,...) >On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 01:09 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > >> So I am just trying to find >> out under what conditions (other than low light) my MZ-S's will fail >> me and an LX would not. Make sense? > >Makes total sense, and I totally can't answer that question. :) > >So just buy the 67II already, will ya? > >-Aaron >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
