On Nov 13, 2009, at 16:42 , J.C. O'Connell wrote:
as good as a $2500 or even $10,000 digital rig sounds,
it doesn't sound nearly as nice a $2500 LP rig. Dollar
for dollar LP sounds better from about $250 and up and
at some point lP just pulls away forver from what even
the worlds finest CD rigs can do at any cost.
A. Read what you are responding to - for comprehension.
B. Listening to music is a personal thing - my ears are not your ears.
C. Ears. A flapping diaphragm that conducts air pressure changes to
the brain through a series of cartilaginous bone, that the brain
interprets as sound (music) based on a lifelong learning curve.
Ca. I'm older than you are, therefor I hear sound better than you do.
(True? BS?)
D. Arguments with absolutes are not arguments, they are foolishness.
There is a disconnect between measurements found in a Audiophile'
magazine and the empirical hearing of the individual.
E. Try recording the sound of the waves hitting the shore, the birds,
and the wind. The recording may be absolutely accurate (tho usually
without the feeling of the space around one) but it is without the
emotion each individual would feel sitting at that spot.
F. Most of this is crap put down while watching Law & Order, Bones,
and Numb3rs.
I do not care for a response. It's just my thoughts on recorded sound
and JC's arguments and the validity or lack thereof of his or any
other theory.
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
“If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn’t need to lug a camera.”
–Lewis Hine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
