ISO 400 looks as good as 100 after eating the mushrooms, but worse before. --M.
On 04/12/2009, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > I got distracted from my todo list by the same mushrooms in my yard that > have been distracting me for the past week or two: > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157622936366544/ > > Since I'm running late, I didn't pull out the macro tripod, I just shot > handheld. I tried both ISO 100 and 400 since experience has taught me > that the K20 does "just fine" on ISO 400. > > But, when I was looking at the pictures in lightroom, I kept noticing > that some of them had a harsh, unpleasant, look to them. I then noticed > that those were the ones that I shot at ISO 400. > > Has anyone noticed that in some situations on the K20 ISO 400 is just > fine, and in others there's a big difference between it and ISO 100? Do > you have a rule of thumb of what those situations are? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Sent from my mobile device -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://www.EnticingTheLight.com -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
