Oops.. Never mind.. I responded under a wrong thread.
> Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:34:17 -0500 (EST) > From: Igor Roshchin > To: PDML@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Spotting Available from a Meteor Wedding > > > > I experienced underexposures while shooting with the flash > (see my message with the topic about 540 FGZ flash). > > > Sat Dec 5 16:17:56 CST 2009 > paul stenquist wrote: > > I find the K7 slightly less noisy than the K20D. Can't remember how > noisy my *istD was. But I would expect the *istD to be a bit less noisy > due to the lower resolution. However, the K7 exposure is very accurate, > so overall noise performance is generally better than any of the Pentax > digitals I've owned (*istD, 10 and 20)-- I rarely have to "bump up" the > exposure. > Paul > > From s...@trantor.komkon.org Sat Dec 5 17:34:18 2009 > Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:34:17 -0500 (EST) > From: Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> > To: PDML@pdml.net > Subject: Re: Spotting Available from a Meteor Wedding > > > > I experienced underexposures while shooting with the flash > (see my message with the topic about 540 FGZ flash). > > > Sat Dec 5 16:17:56 CST 2009 > paul stenquist wrote: > > I find the K7 slightly less noisy than the K20D. Can't remember how > noisy my *istD was. But I would expect the *istD to be a bit less noisy > due to the lower resolution. However, the K7 exposure is very accurate, > so overall noise performance is generally better than any of the Pentax > digitals I've owned (*istD, 10 and 20)-- I rarely have to "bump up" the > exposure. > Paul > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
