The 16-45 is on the way out (logical IMO). Neither wr or L 18-55 and 50-200 should go as well. On Wednesday, December 9, 2009, Peter Loveday <pe...@loveday.org> wrote: > > http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/850701/Main/850689/ > > > Another 100mm macro? > > What are they thinking. > > Have they not noticed the gap left between the 16-45 / 16-50 / 17-70 / 18-55 > (x4) zooms? I am really hanging out for a 17.5-59mm model. Preferably f/3.1. > > - Peter > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
