in a small web image. Much better in a larger image/print as the detail gets lost when too small.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Thomas Cakalic <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Frank. Yes it was the Pentax DA14/2.8. Thanks for the other > comments from others a well. This is the kind of shot that doesn't > work as well in > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:01 PM, frank theriault > <knarftheria...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> A three photo gallery of some spring wildlflowers taken a few miles >>> from home in Spring 2008. Belatedly and maybe because it's been drab >>> and gray the last two days: >>> >>> http://photo.net/photodb/presentation?presentation_id=488178 >> >> These are beautiful, Tom. You must have been using a very wide lens? >> Whatever the case, they're beautifully composed and I love the >> colours. >> >> Only one teensy problem: I can no longer look at that type of flower >> without thinking, "Your lupines or your life!", and then humming the >> Dennis Moore tune... >> >> ;-) >> -- >> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
