On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 13/01/2010, eckinator <eckina...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hate to say so John but that is how the trouble started on my 1st >> 16-50 (also frequent forum opinion). > > These SDM lenses might have great optics but the number of stories > relating to failures keeps me well away, I just don't need the grief. > I'm so glad people air their frustrations on public fora like this. It > must be a nightmare for companies that used to get away with snubbing > off owners of equipment with systemic failures by denying that the > problems were commonplace. > I easily have 20,000 exposures on my three SDM Pentax lenses, with no problems. That's just one case, so it proves nothing, but I'm very satisfied. Paul > -- > Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) > Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours > Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
