Wow, that is impressive, but everything does great with the DA* 50-135mm
:-). Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Roshchin" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 2:18 AM
Subject: I am impressed - high-ISO performance of K-x
I had a chance to test K-x over the weekend using high-ISO in
low-light setting.
As I wrote in another thread, it was very underwhelming with 16-50/2.8,
but that was a problem of the lens (in my very subjective opinion).
It did great with 50-135/2.8:
ISO-3200:
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP4428.html
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0114.html
ISO-1600:
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0292.html
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0310.html
http://42graphy.org/swing/lonestar-2010/_IGP0323.html
It's a hard decision...
I like K-7's feel and AF-performance and
other features better, but as many pointed out, K-x's matrix is
_MUCH_ better at high ISO.
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
