Very much appreciated. If there is enough difference I may spring for a K-x.
-- Bruce Sunday, January 31, 2010, 9:36:20 PM, you wrote: RS> On 01/02/2010, Bruce Dayton <bkday...@daytonphoto.com> wrote: >> At my daughter's game yesterday, I took shots in the gym feeling the >> lighting will be somewhat representative of what I will face for the >> gymnastic meet (I have shot this meet the last two years). >> >> Here is one shot: >> Pentax K20D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 108mm >> ISO 3200, 1/200 @ f/2.8 >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp3057-1.htm >> >> Here is 100% crop: >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp3057-2.htm >> >> As you cans see, ISO is about as high as the K20D will do and lens is >> wide open. Shutter speed is a bit low, especially for gymnastics. >> >> So, would the K-x improve things? Could I get better quality at ISO >> 6400 with it? RS> I'll try to do some comparative shots using my K20D and K-X with the RS> same lens later tonight. RS> -- RS> Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) RS> Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours RS> Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
