Those pages are "bet" from magazine, their take on what will happen (maybe based on actual facts).
10-16/4 is BS. If there's one it will be /2.8. K-m2 is BS as well, certainly with a fake body base on k20d and about 20/28mm both lens are same size and suspiciously compact one at that. Smell the BS. It might hint at a couple things to come though. On Tuesday, February 9, 2010, jtainter <jtain...@mindspring.com> wrote: > >From Dpreview: > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=34485521 > > 645D > K-m2 > DA*10-16 f/4 > DA*20 f/2 > DA*28 f/2 > > Maybe more than the usual rumor. There seem to be photos of the gear: > > http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=34485615 > > which points to: > > http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?tid=827626&extra=page%3D1 > > The DA* 20 F2.0 look very interesting, but it would have to be quite large? > > The DA 10-16 F4 is disappointing. It probably means that Pentax won't bring > out a DA version of the excellent and very useful Tokina 11-16 F2.8. Still, I > could live with F4 in such a lens if Pentax could improve high ISO > performance. > > Joe > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
