Cotty wrote:
<http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=10891938>
On 10/4/10, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
Really? Gosh - I love the first one of this diner but in this one I
see no detail in the foreground and
think it's much too wide a shot... Hey wat do these Brits know about
diners anyway (ann ducks)
Not a great deal, but we do like a fried breakfast now and again. Well,
now anyway.
Got the -wish I could be at GFM blues do ya?)
I like it because of the space surrounding it, which creates a frame
within a frame, if you will. The fact that nothing else appears to be
adjacent gives me a sense that things have moved on and the diner has
been left behind, forlorn. For me a photograph is a 'story' in a
nutshell. The photographer tells that story in how the photograph is
presented. A closer crop would tell me a different story - as it is, I
like the story I'm getting from this one :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
I agree about a photo being a story in a nutshell - I think the first
story tells it as well
and is more interesting to look at. So I must disagree (now and then,
Cotters :-) )
xo,
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
