I had one for a while. Build quality was questionable. It felt pretty
plastic, if you know what I mean. The images were OK for me though the
lens didn't get good reviews from whatever pixel peepers used to be in
the film days. The zoom range wasn't enough on either end and it's too
slow. It saved my istD from certain death when Daughter 1.0 pulled the
pair from the high kitchen counter one day. Broke the lens in half but
the camera was fine. I replaced it with a 28-105.
CW
On 5/4/2010 2:56 AM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
I'd been buying several older FA lenses and Samsung's D-series lenses
recently. Found good deal for FA 35-80mm f/3.5-5.6 tele-zoom. What can
you say about it? I can't find many larger sample images to see what
it's about in pictures...
Your comments highly appreciated,
________________________________________________________________________
K20D, DA 10-17, D-XENON 18-55, DA* 16-50, FA 50 F1.4, DA 50-200,
ELINCHROM, BOWENS
more @ roman.blakout.net | roman.4models.info
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2852 - Release Date: 05/03/10
14:27:00
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
