Thanks, Jack and Ecke.
The 18-250 was at 250. We had gotten a stuffed churro on the pier,
which really wasn't very good. I was sitting on the ground, holding
little bits of it in one hand, shooting with the other. At least until
one of the gulls saw that what was left was under my leg and jumped in
and took all that was left.
On May 21, 2010, at 5:35 AM, eckinator wrote:
Nice =)
Did you use a remote for the 16-50 shot?
I used my cable release. This was the day before and I didn't have
any churro to tempt the birds in closer with.
And is the DA* pigeon poo proof?
Fortunately, I didn't test that.
Cheers
Ecke
2010/5/21 Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com>:
The Tamron 18-250 is not an ideal lens for birding, but
occasionally it's
adequately sharp:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4626335024/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4625707599/
Though occasionally you can even get in close enough with the 16-50
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4626341078/sizes/o/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
