2010/6/17 Bob W <p...@web-options.com>:
>> My point was that if you look at modern man's known history and tally
>> the societies that have not resorted to the latter two, you get a
>> pretty short list. The likelihood that what we are today has evolved
>> from something both expansionistic and exceedingly peaceful is
>> pitifully small in my opinion.
>>
>
> As I mentioned before, you can't take historical behaviour as a reliable
> guide to prehistoric behaviour.

Sure it's unreliable. But to deny the possibility of it happening is
even more so.

> The idea that we deliberately killed them all is just not very parsimonious
> as an explanation.

I think we will just end up repeating ourselves here. Both of us have
pointed at several mechanisms other than peace-and-love by which
modern humans replaced the 'thals.

Call me pessimist on our ancestors' behalf, if you like.



-- 
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to