On Jun 23, 2010, at 10:40 PM, paul stenquist wrote: > The K10D is a nice camera and delivers good results in moderate to good > light. It's low light capabilities are subpar by today's standards. You can > probably find a K20D for just a bit more, and it's a lot more camera. A new > Kx might be good if you expect to do a lot of low light work. But the k20 > will give you some things that the Kx doesn't, including weather proofing and > a buffer that will keep you shooting longer. And It's probably a better buy > right now. Of course that assumes the previous owner hasn't abused it. The KX > is a safe bet on that count, in that you'd br buying a new camera.
And thanks for your response, too, Paul. The K20D hadn't occurred to me. The things you mention about it are appealing. Looks like a toss-up between the Kx and K20d. If I can find one in good condition at a reasonable price it might just be the K20D. And my apologies to everyone for highjacking the thread. I should've changed the subject heading before starting to compose my message. Sincerely, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
