On 7/1/2010 9:11 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-07-01 17:25, Larry Colen wrote:
I've seen a few too many examples of people who have just learned
that changing aperture would affect the depth of field pontificating
Have you been reading KR's web site again? :-)
Oh, please. KR hasn't realized he can turn ignore features he doesn't use.
It would be nice if such a group existed, but like most idealistic
utopias, there are many, many, structural challenges.
It would, indeed. My experience has been that a working "bare
knuckle" group is far more likely to meet physically than
electronically. I wish it weren't so, because it's getting harder and
harder to collect a group like that in meatspace.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
