In all the comparisons I watched (3) the mirror "up" bounce was pretty
well controlled, with a fairly long pause prior to the shutter
activation. It's the return that is much less controlled on most of
them. Then another really long pause before the cycle begins again.
And as was said, to get a higher frame rate, it cost a lot more to
control that mirror (and shutter flutter). More than I am willing to
pay.
On Aug 19, 2010, at 01:00 , eckinator wrote:
2010/8/19 Adam Maas <a...@mawz.ca>:
I suspect it comes down to 8+ fps cameras need better damping and get
it. Note the 5D, like the K10D, is a 3fps camera in the high-end
consumer/semi-pro market. The F5 and D3 are much higher-end cameras
at
higher prices and with far higher framerates.
Oh definitely but one would think that mirror wobble or lack of
damping thereof introduces vibration into the system. Question is,
does this have any impact on second and subsequent shot SR in serial
exposures (I won't talk of high speed there, my old FD Canons all did
4.5 or 5 fps resp.)?
Cheers
Ecke
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
“If I could tell the story in words, I wouldn’t need to lug a camera.”
–Lewis Hine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
