My only 70-200 was the 2.8 version by Tokina. You could kill a charing bear with that lens. The M 200 fits in my bag and I'll probably actually take it with me. As I get older, I find this becomes and increasingly important aspect of lens performance. The bag holds the K7, the FA20-35, the FA501.4, the FA135 2.8 and the 200. I can also sneak the E-P1 with the 20 1.7 in the end pocket. The only problem with this kit is that a bad day of shooting is clearly my fault.;-)
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ha! I've got you beat. I paid $69.00 for mine. Still while it's a very > good if not excellent lens. I don't find that it preforms much better than > any of the 70-210mm lenses I've aquiered over the years. And it's not any > smaller or much lighter than the F 70-210.and only a stop faster at 200mm. > > Oh, and buy the way that is a very nice photo. > > On 9/17/2010 5:42 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: >> >> >> http://s857.photobucket.com/albums/ab138/drd1135/PDML/?action=view¤t=sun200.jpg >> >> K7, m200, f8, 1/500 iso 400 on a monopod. I'm pleased with the result for >> $79. > > > -- > "His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed > moral bankruptcy." > -Woody Allen > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
