Yeah, I didn't think I was being sexist with my statements. The fact is that, when people are married, their money is THEIR money, not his money. My wife has no interest whatsoever in photography, and when I acquire a piece of equipment, she understands that it is just my hobby.
Jeffery On Oct 10, 2010, at 5:43 PM, paul stenquist wrote: > I don't think that fiscal responsibility is a trait that is exclusive to one > gender or the other. On the other hand, I don'tI think that a bit of good > natured banter about the wife who controls the purse strings is sexism. Men > and women do have some innate differences in temperament and priorities. At > one time, those differences were at least taken for granted if not applauded. > Nowadays, society works far too hard to establish institutional sameness. > Sameness is boring; differentiation is a good thing. > Paul > Paul > On Oct 10, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > >> Thanks, Christine, for puncturing some of the latent sexism in this thread. >> >> In our household, I am the stingier of us, and it often takes a nudge from >> my wife to overcome my deeply ingrained resistance to spending money. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Rick >> >> http://photo.net/photos/RickW >> >> >> --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Christine Nielsen <ch...@inielsen.net> wrote: >> >>> This may surprise you fellas, but we >>> wives get "the urge", too, you know... >>> >>> (Sorry- still talking about cameras. What were you >>> thinking?) >>> >>> ;) >>> -c >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 10, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, it's a dilemma. Especially when you have a joint >>> bank account and a vigilant wife. :( >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> >>>>> Subject: Re: The Urge >>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>> Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 6:29 AM >>>>> On 10/10/2010 2:36 PM, Jack Davis >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Simply holding the latest model's advanced >>> technology >>>>> in your very >>>>>> own hands is a fix many of us "need." Having >>> 500 hp >>>>> under the hood >>>>>> doesn't mean you'll use it..but the "power" of >>> its >>>>> presence can be >>>>>> intoxicating. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jack >>>>> >>>>> Mind over matter or matter over mind? ;-) Or even >>> like >>>>> this: >>>>> To mind or not to mind? That is the matter :-). >>>>> >>>>> Boris >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the >>> link >>>>> directly above and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>> directly above and follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>> directly above and follow the directions. >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
