Mark, Lovely photo and appropriate way to evaluate TC images. They help you get something better, but don't expect miracles. Ken Waller and his 600mm is always gonna beat you and your 300mm w/TC. Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote: > Ken Waller wrote: > >>When using them is the difference of getting/not getting the image I want - >>I use them. >>I can't say the loss of resolution and contrast has been an issue for me in >>their usage. > > Same here. As someone on the PDML once pointed out, the correct > comparison isn't between one lens with a teleconverter and another > lens of the resulting focal length; the proper comparison is between a > photo using the teleconverter and photo taken with the same lens sans > teleconverter, enlarged and cropped to the same field of view. With > *good quality* glass (primary lens and TC) you get better end results > with the teleconverter. > Here's one that worked for me: > http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d904208.htm > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
