On 6 December 2010 20:03, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Here's a list of tested cameras from PF. Is this akin to everyone on an 
> airplane getting sick at the same time? BTW, my unaffected camera is 3823799. 
> The condition doesn't seem to be serial number specific.
> Paul
>
> 382xxxx - yes
> 3820670 - no
> 3820688 - yes
> 3820888 - yes
> 38226xx - yes
> 3822724 - yes
> 3822871 - yes
> 3823812 - no
> 3823850 - no
> 3823862 - no
> 3823875 - yes
> 3823936 - no
> 3823993 - yes
> 3825xxx - yes
> 3827069 - yes
> 3828xxx - no
> 3830xxx - yes
> 3836407 - no
> 3839502 - yes
> 3842*** - yes
> 3842409 - yes
> 3842568 - yes
> 3849.. - yes
> 3849889 - no
> 3850... - yes ( a dot is a yes Blende)
> 3850011 - yes
> 3850025 - yes
> 38506xx - yes
> 3851607 - yes
> 3858324 - yes
> 3877*** - no
> 3889... - no
> 3889359 - yes
> 3890099 - yes
> 3894*** - no
> 3894706 - no
> 3900xxx. - no
> (updated..... )
>
> Read more at: 
> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#ixzz17NpJyTTi


Ouch!

http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#post1293433

That's nasty...

My unit is a 3889xxx


   —M.

    \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com

    http://EnticingTheLight.com
    A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to