Sorry. I fought bronchitis for two weeks. As I "grow wiser", these bouts of common illnesses just kick my ass.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:50 AM, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >> "I'm surprised anyone cares. Voting is a colossal waste of time." >> >> My political philosophy. > > That too. > Paul > > Feeling inordinately gruff, after a horrible 24-hour flu. > > >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:29 PM, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >>> >>>> Reads as though you must have read my last email to Pentax.;) Seems to me >>>> that if the voting is allowed to continue, the 20% criterion may be >>>> ultimately met even though the image was allegedly toast at 60 votes. >>>> Makes my head hurt. >>>> My guess is that many have become bored with voting and those who are may >>>> be spending time on dead horse images.(??) >>>> >>>> Jack >>> >>> I'm surprised anyone cares. Voting is a colossal waste of time. >>> >>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 12/21/10, AlunFoto <alunf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: AlunFoto <alunf...@gmail.com> >>>>> Subject: Re: PPG VOTING >>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>>> Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 3:47 PM >>>>> 2010/12/21 Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> I so don't get this, but I'm told that due to time >>>>> constraints, voting may go >>>>>> on beyond the 60 to as many as 200. Couldn't get a >>>>> clear answer as to why. >>>>>> Why should the largly dead horse voting be allowed to >>>>> continue, thus >>>>>> detracting from surviving image voting and delaying >>>>> the process? >>>>> >>>>> My understanding is that If it gets 12 nays out of 60, it >>>>> is removed >>>>> from the queue and flagged as rejected on the artist's >>>>> page. If you >>>>> get a fast rejection, it's because of getting 12 nays >>>>> before reaching >>>>> a total of 60 votes. >>>>> >>>>> What would be interesting to know is what happens as votes >>>>> accumulate >>>>> beyond 60. 12 out of 60 is 20%. Does that mean that if ever >>>>> a photo >>>>> tops 20% nays, it's out? That seems logical to me. >>>>> >>>>> I assume votes can accumulate until presented to the Pentax >>>>> team. So >>>>> time constraints could very well be a way to say that the >>>>> team don't >>>>> have time to meet frequently enough to do away with the >>>>> queue at 60 >>>>> votes. >>>>> >>>>> Jostein >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ >>>>> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>>>> directly above and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steve Desjardins >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
