thanks guys, didn't bid high enough I guess cheers ecke 2011/1/16 David J Brooks <pentko...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:13 PM, P. J. Alling > <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Editing my own post for clarity. I really should proof read these before I >> hit send. > > Hum, maybe i should....oh never mind > > Dave >> >> On 1/16/2011 10:20 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: >>> >>> On 1/16/2011 9:50 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >>>> >>>> http://www.henrys.ca/57376-USED-PENTAX-K1000-SLR-BODY--8-Plus-.aspx >>>> This is what the K1000 commands around here. I think its way to high, >>>> but...... >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:23 AM, eckinator<eckina...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> hi gang >>>>> >>>>> what would be a realistic price for each of these individually? >>>>> any input is greatly appreciated >>>>> >>>>> thanks in advance >>>>> ecke >>>>> >>>>> bodies: >>>>> MX - fairly few traces of use as judged by age >>> >>> Sadly these seem to go for no more than a K1000. Happily due to student >>> demand that cab be upwards of $200.00 >>> >>>>> ME super - medium amount of visible use >>> >>> You might get $50-60 for it. >>> >>>>> MX - much visible use but fully functional >>> >>> Half to three quarters of the Better one. If it's functional. Most >>> people judge by looks. >>> >>>>> K1000 - used very little >>> >>> Probably $200 plus in a College town. >>> >>>>> lenses: >>>>> smc-m 50/2 - slight wear, no dings or scratches >>> >>> $20 or throw it in with one of the bodies. >>> >>>>> panagor automacro converter - next to no visible use >>> >>> No clue but not much probably.$20.00. >>> >>>>> tokina rmc 25-50/4 - good shape, little wear >>> >>> I really have no idea on this one. But I doubt it would fetch much more >>> than $100, and I'm only guessing that because it's a fixed aperture and a >>> fairly wide minimum focal length. >>> >>>>> komura teleconverter Telemore 95 II - hardly used >>> >>> I assume K mount, I've never seen one in K. This was a much sought after >>> teleconverter, having a very good reputation for producing good images when >>> coupled with a good lens. They were very expensive when new. Now I doubt >>> you'll get much more than you would for some cheap crap TC, at most $20-30. >>> I'd try for if I were the seller, but I'd be really happy if I were the >>> buyer. >> >> That should be "I'd try for more if I were the seller." >> >>> >>>>> ebc fujinon t 135/2.5 with m42 adaptor >>> >>> Those Fuji lenses are supposed to be very good but screw mounts are a dime >>> a dozen.so Id expect maybe $50 bucks, and that's >> >> Should be: "...that's with the adapter which would be worth about $20." >> >>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>>> follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
