So, he complains about DOF issues, then provides these images with these astounding laws-of-physics-defying insane depth-of-field... wondering what he would think of as *good* DOF? -T
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > Spectacular images. Wow. > > On Apr 19, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Krisjanis Linkevics wrote: > >> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-medium-format-645-6x7-645d/139755-my-final-thoughts-645d.html >> >> kris >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
