Thank you all for the advice that you have given and sorry this is so short
seeing as you Stan wrote out a lot of information. I really have no plans of
spending an arm and a leg on the lenses. One of the main reasons is, well to
be honest, I just can't afford it. Well I have to get off here and head on
to work. If I end up getting the lenses I will report back on them and it
will probably be the weekend before I experiment with them to see how well I
am going to be able to use older lenses.

Again thanks so much it is truly appreciated...

Jeffery

___________________________________________________
Pictures that I have taken on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/

-----Original Message-----
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stan
Halpin
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 10:29 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Advice

Apologies in advance if I am telling you something you already know . . .

There are at least 3 questions you should ask when thinking about a used
lens. The first question is the one you are asking here: will this lens work
on my camera? And it is a good question! Three are more than a few of us who
got carried away with a super eBay deal on a Pentax lens, forgetting to note
that the lens is an older screw-mount that requires an adapter.

>From others' replies it sounds like there is a good chance that these are
appropriate lenses. However, next you need to ask "do I want this lens on my
camera?" There are at least two reasons that you might not want to buy and
use a lens that fits on our camera. First, if the front or (even worse) the
rear lens elements are scratched, then any images you take are going to be
somewhat degraded. Depending on how bad the scratching, how much image
degradation, maybe you can live with it for a while, but definitely don't
pay much if anything because you will be replacing those lenses soon.
Second, the more serious issue is whether or not the lens shows signs of
fungus growth on the lens elements. This hasn't been discussed on the PDML
recently, but it is something you need to know about. Open the aperture and
look through the lens, both from the back and the front. Point the lens
towards a white or off white wall if possible. Oftentimes it helps if you
look through at a slight angle rather than straight through. If you see fine
tracings like a small spider-web on the inside lens surfaces, run, do not
walk, but run away from that purchase. Don't even accept such a lens as a
gift. They are virtually impossible to clean (though a good technician a can
dismantle the lens and give it a try, but that is expensive). Worse, the
fungal spores may propagate to other lenses in your bag/storage closet. It
isn't likely, but why take the chance? Unless it is a very rare and
potentially valuable lens worth the time and effort to try and clean it,
don't mess with an infected lens.

Third question: if the lens fits (and seems like it may be useful), and it
is reasonably scratch-free and totally fungus free, you may still want to
pass if the price is too high. Too high doesn't depend on what you can
afford; if you have $50 to burn and are offered a $25 lens, that price may
still be too high. Price/value is determined by scarcity, condition, and
utility. The scarcity and condition are tough unless you have been carefully
tracking multiple markets including eBay and others, and unless you have
seen enough examples of what people call "like new", "good condition", etc.
Hopefully the lenses you are interested in are available through KEH. My
working rule-of-thumb when I was more actively involved in buying and
selling lenses is that I would not pay more than 80% of the KEH "bargain"
price for the lens. In other words, if KEH had a "bargain" SMC 50/1.4 for
$100, I would not pay anyone else more than $80 for the same lens in "good"
condition. I would rather deal with KEH, pay a little extra, and be
confident that I was getting good merchandise that could be easily returned
in the odd event that I found something wrong.

Hope this helps . . .

stan
 
On Apr 25, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:

> I have a want ad on craigslist for lenses that will work on a Pentax
camera.
> Well after two months of having the ad on craigslist I have heard from 
> a lovely lady that has the following lenses. Now she read the 
> information to me over the phone as the only computer she has access 
> to is at work so she was not able to email me that information. I will 
> be meeting her tomorrow afternoon after work at a neutral location (a 
> restaurant) to buy said lenses. I am new to older lenses so will these 
> even work on my K-R without having to get an adopter and also are these
worth buying.
> 
> SMC Pentax f  1:1.4/50
> zoom l37 52mm Nikon (the description she gave was for the filter that 
> is on the lens so not even sure what this lens could be.) sigma zoom 
> 1:3.5-4.5 f28-84mm
> 
> Need help with this this evening as I stated have plans on meeting 
> tomorrow evening.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeffery
> ___________________________________________________
> Pictures that I have taken on Flickr:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jt-johnson/


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to