Thanks for looking, Brian. I'm strictly guessing, but I suspect any speed near or below 1/1000s, of course, would allow movement of the prop. How much...?
Jack --- On Sun, 5/15/11, Brian Walters <supera1...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > From: Brian Walters <supera1...@fastmail.fm> > Subject: Re: PESO: Duster Pano > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Sunday, May 15, 2011, 12:35 AM > On Sat, 14 May 2011 07:58 -0700, > "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > Received at least one comment offering a wish that I'd > posted a full > > frame of "Fun With AF_C(2)." > > See link. (Did make a slight crop of the top edge) > > > > Opinions? > > > > > I prefer this one. > > I'd have liked to have seen some more motion of the > propeller and I > notice that the camera chose 1/6400 sec for the exposure. I > wonder how > slow the shutter speed would have to be to get propeller > motion while > still being able to pan for sharpness of the plane > itself. I had a > similar issue with the helicopter photos I posted about a > year ago. > Seems difficult! > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home > and the web > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
