Thanks, Frank! Yes, I agree, as a true depiction a substantial amount of prop blur would have made it more realistic. This was a test of the AF system including Focus-Tracking. From what I can see, all images, from the time I could make out the focus and up to the instant the plane went over my head, showed the predictive AF worked extremely well. Considering the rate of approach, especially as it came near, pleases me!
Jack --- On Tue, 5/17/11, frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: frank theriault <knarftheria...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: PESO: Planting Rice > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 8:18 AM > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:56 AM, > David J Brooks <pentko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > A little prop blur and...........:-) > > Yeah, I was thinking that, too. It's a terrific shot, > no doubt about > it, and yes, the props are slightly blurred, but just a bit > more > motion blur of the propeller would have been nice. > > Just a tiny nit, though, it's a very good photo! > > cheers, > frank > > > -- > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri > Cartier-Bresson > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
