On Jul 14, 2011, at 7:59 PM, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11-07-14 6:57 PM, Tim Bray wrote: >> It's beautiful. I'd like to hold one, well any 645D, in my hand, and >> shoot some shots. But really, there's no way it's remotely sensible. >> 645D vs K-5: >> >> Pro: >> - More pixels! >> - Looks groovy (even in black) >> >> Con: >> - Thousands more >> - Heavier >> - Bigger >> - Fewer lenses >> - Less sensitive >> - More pixels >> >> People who read me on G+ know that I'm having the devil of a time >> trying to get http://goo.gl/fcL8E to print with color accuracy. But >> this ISO3200 K-5 APS-C shot has no trouble blowing up to 13x19 in >> terms of resolution.... >> >> Now, what does anyone need a 645D for? >> >> -Tim > > Well, for one thing, I would like to print some stuff at 36" x 48" or bigger. > Macros, for example, look outstanding printed big like that. So do > landscapes (good ones anyway, not mine). > Yep---& the delicious detail! Cheers, Christine > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
