> > FYI! Saw this on Twitter just now. Cheers, Christine > > > > http://pdnpulse.com/2011/09/good-riddance-to-burning-man.html > > I've seen those rumors before, and that is far beyond what it has > always been. > > http://blog.burningman.com/2011/01/digital-rights/updated-terms-and- > conditions-for-2011/ > > This may be the phrase that they're responding to: > Burning Man forbids the making of private profit from the documentation > of nudity at the event when images are presented in a sexual context, > and/or without the express written permission of subjects. > >
there's been some discussion about this before. That sort of clause is almost certainly impossible to enforce in law. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
