On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Steven Desjardins <drd1...@gmail.com> wrote: > They made it because it was easy and there are some who will take > great delight in picking up a $50 M50.17 at KEH and have it be a > really fast lens with a 275 fov. Even at that, it still won't be that > big and you just throw it in a bag and pull it out on occasion. Anyone > who buys this camera is the first place is having some fun. So overly > serious measurebater would go near it anyway. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: >> From: Sam L >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Dario Bonazza <dario.bona...@virgilio.it> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Just to see how it looks: >>>> http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news/20110905_475272.html >>>> >>>> Dario >>> >>> Obviously pentax has to make an adapter from K to Q mount. >>> >>> Yet I have never seen anything quite as retarded. It is a little >>> bit like mounting a race engine to a bicycle. >>> >>> If you bought the Q, you wanted a small camera. If you mount anything >>> but a Q (or similar tiny lens), >>> then your camera is no longer small. >>> >>> Sorry for stating the obvious! >> >> I just thought it looked like the old adapter for mounting Pentax 67 lenses >> on K mount bodies.
Just thought I'd pop in to mention that I enjoyed reading all the responses on the topic even though I'm more in a lurking mode. --------------------------- Sam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
