On Oct 22, 2011, at 7:37 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > One simply cannot say enough good things about the 43mm limited.
"enough good things about the 43mm limited." I don't know. I didn't have any trouble saying it. Paul > > On 10/22/2011 1:11 PM, Stan Halpin wrote: >> Or the 43mm Limited which would cost less and possibly fill the 24-77 gap >> more comfortably. >> >> stan >> >> On Oct 22, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> >>> When you can afford a 31mm Limited, you won't regret it. >>> Regards, Bob S. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Michael Beacom<mbea...@mac.com> wrote: >>>> Hi- >>>> >>>> I bought a Pentax 12-24mm zoom, and a 77mm Limited with the K-5. >>>> It should be fast, for indoors available light, and somewhat south of >>>> $500ish. >>>> >>>> My first thought was the 40mm f2.8 Limited Pancake. >>>> >>>> On second thought, the plastic mounted 35mm DA L f2.4 might make a nice >>>> interim lens. it can be shifted to the K100D bag if a better lens comes >>>> along. >>>> >>>> Any opinions or suggestions? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Mike >>>> >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthily search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
