Yes
but I haven't looked to see if anyone said anything
ann
On 10/25/2011 10:18, Bong Manayon wrote:
Anybody activated their commenting feature yet?
Bong
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Ann Sanfedele<ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
On 10/25/2011 01:15, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I just found the submission page, accessible from the artist
dashboard. I tried it out, and was able to upload an image. It
seemed easier that under the previous system.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
It looks like you can only upload one photo at a time...
I did three. Ironically, I couldn't upload a few because I had
previously sized them down to the dimension limits they had earlier
(600 high) so it rejected it as too small.
They no longer specify which areas are "required" and the list for chosing
category is slightly different in the paragraph telling you
what they are and the actual list you click on.
still, it is pretty fast and easy to see.
all in all it is better than before, I think
ann
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
<danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote:
There is a notice on the artist page that images may be submitted in
only one category. Since they were previously listed in several
categories, the one category now given may not be the best. I am
going through my gallery and changing some of the categories.
Any hint as to when new submissions will be accepted?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:20 PM, mike wilson<m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:
On 24/10/2011 20:29, Tim Bray wrote:
That web site is, to use a technical term, b0rked. Various flavors of
breakage in various browsers. Given the huge number of competent Web
design/staging shops everywhere in the world, it puzzles me how it's
possible to produce such a bad result.
-T
They let a Swedish chef puppet create it.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Mark Roberts<m...@robertstech.com>
wrote:
Stan Halpin wrote:
FWIW, I have tried all of the various general and Ann-specific links
y'all have provided. Every single one produces a horribly
misformatted page
which is definitely not ready for prime time. Using Safari on my Mac.
At
least it loaded fast!
I just tried it in Safari (on Windows 7 though) and it worked great.
Also works in Opera and Firefox. The only thing I don't like is that
it relies on outside APIs through JavaScript so I have to tell
NoScript to accept googleapi.com every time I visit.
Vast improvement over the old gallery. Flash sucks (mostly).
--
No fixed Adobe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
