On 10/27/2011 17:11, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The copyright does show, although it's not prominent.
They added it. It wasn't on my original.
I don't think it will do much for me in any case,
but I'm pleased that they chose it. It was on the opening page of the
old gallery as well.
Paul
Did I mention I haven't had my eyese checked in the last 6 years?
after I zoomed in three times I saw it, but just barely... not as
clearly as the copyrights are on the actual gallery shots. but even
with my trouble with contrast, if they are going to use it I'd have
thought it would be clearer and give you a heads up.
ann
On Oct 27, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I think you should at least have your copyright showing up on there...
it's not good publicity of no one knows who took it.
And here I thought they were jsut covering their asses for the thumbnail
shots...
a
On 10/27/2011 16:47, Paul Stenquist wrote:
...in an ad and e-mail blast.
I guess I have no recourse but to be somewhat flattered.
I know the new gallery says they can use the pics in any way they see fit.
Did the old gallery specify that as well?
It's here:
http://pentax.thinkbigsolutions.com/N00412_eblast/index_online.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
