On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:50:49PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:48 PM, John Francis wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:27:33AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 10/31/2011 10:58 AM, John Francis wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:55:42AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > >>>> When I saw Paul joining the bandwagon, I had to jump on with this > >>>> shot from the PDML outing on Saturday. No, she wasn't one of the > >>>> PDML crowd. > >>>> > >>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6299046803/in/set-72157627896447265/ > >>> > >>> And, of course, you only took the shot because she was holding a camera > >>> ... > >> > >> This photo doesn't show it so well, but she looked like she was > >> using a DSLR, but holding the camera several inches in front of her > >> face. Too close to use the LCD, but too far to use the viewfinder, > >> or so it looked. > >> > >> There is also the fun theme of photos taking photos of others. I > >> honestly don't remember the tights as being nearly that provocative > >> in person. This is one of those photos that came out very > >> differently than it looked in person. > > > > Oh, I don't know. I was standing right beside you when you took that shot, > > and when I looked over to see what you were capturing I just assumed you > > were intrigued by the spray-on legwear. I think the shot is a pretty > > accurate reflection of how things appeared (to me, at least) at the time. > > At first glance, I thought she was pantsless.
As I mention in another post, the colour balance here makes that a slighlty easier mistake to make than it was at the scene. But at the time I did wonder if she realised just what an image she was presenting. (I also wondered if she would be bothered in the slightest if she did know). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
