On 1/25/2012 9:39 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012, at 1:03, Cotty wrote:
<http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/01/25/Imitated_Image_Copyright_Case>
Favorite comment so far:
"This means that any photographer who has used Selective Color can be called a
criminal. Maybe that's a good thing."
It's clear that the concept was copied. I also think the "copy" image is better than the
"original". However, I think the judge in this case is a bit off the mark.
-Charles
I'd say lets be fair, but no I don't want to be fair and I don't believe
this idiot of a judge deserves fairness, he has no understanding of
reality or the law. Judicial decisions such as these are one of the
many reasons the law falls into disrepute.
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
