On Jan 28, 2012, at 7:22 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2012, at 5:01 PM, AlunFoto wrote: > >> Larry Colen wrote: >>> >> >> The image quality is where the 645D shines, though. I haven't been >> able to really pin it down to technical terms what it is, but working >> with the raw files, there seem to be just More Of Everything. Pixels, >> tonal range, colour richness... I may be talking BS here, but at a gut >> level that's what it feels like working with them. > > > Given you skill and expertise, I doubt you're "talking BS". I'm sure many > would very much trust your "gut." Brilliant gallery! Just beautiful! > cheers, Christine
Jostein, I can read the specifications, and the dxomark scores. It's your gut level that I'm interested in, because that is what can't be enumerated into a simple one dimensional number. My guess is that where the difference is most noticeable is on prints, especially large prints. But, I've not seen any prints from a 645D in person. > -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
