> > It's one of those > hold-it-out-at-arms-length-and-focus-using-the-little-TV-screen-on-the- > back > cameras. > > Gonna' take a lot of strength in your wrists to hold it up when you add > the weight of a long lens hanging off the front. >
I'm sure anyone who'd do that would have plenty of wrist strength... B > > From: Tim Bray > > > Why do we know that long lenses will be problematic? I must have > missed that. -T > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:41 PM, P. J. Alling > > <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We've got a pretty good idea how it preforms photographically, the > sensor is > >> in the same family as the K5 the electronic guts of the beast is in > all > >> probability a streamlined version of the K5. ?It will make > photographs ?that > >> will be compariable to the K5. ?Frame rate is 5fps.about like the K7 > ?So > >> aside from the lack of a viewfinder we know it will preform like a > K5. ?If > >> it had a decent EVF it would be worthy of consideration as a > complementary > >> body used with a K5 or K7. ?We know, more or less, that long lenses > used > >> with it will be problematic. ?Sp there's little enough to discuss > except > >> it's aesthetics. > >> > >> On 2/10/2012 9:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote: > >>> > >>> Yeah, but how does it perform photographically? > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
