On Jun 15, 2012, at 12:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Not, really the field of view changes but the magnification doesn't.
Until you print it, or do something besides look at the image on the negative or the sensor. Of course, we're talking magnification at different stages in the process. Language, she is a tricky thing. No? > If you print a 1:1 image, of the same subject, the actual size of the > capture medium, from any format, say 645, then do the same with 35mm and line > up the 35mm print on top of the 645 print the subject will be the same size, > but the 645 image will show more of the subject and it's surroundings. > > On 6/15/2012 3:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> It's interesting that the 1:2 definition has nothing to do with image size, >> or field of view. A 1:2 lens on a u4/3 is effectively a lot more >> magnification than 1:1 on a 645, or even a 645D, and about the same as 1:1 >> on a 35mm. >> >>> >> -- >> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthly search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.