And it is indeed "cost-effective". A mistake in my previous message: the "good" Dell monitor is the U2410, which cost about $491 (@amazon.com). That's over $200 extra.
Alex Sarbu On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> wrote: > > Alex, > > This is a good point that I should have mentioned explicitly. > Indeed, it is not as good as some other Ultrasharp Dells, but from the > reviews I read about it, it still provides very reasonable colors. > That's why I called it's "cost-effective". > I didn't remember what exactly was inferior, and didn't have time > to look it up. So, your clarification can be useful to people > interested. > > Igor > > > Wed Aug 22 07:50:11 EDT 2012 > Alexandru-Cristian Sarbu wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Igor Roshchin <str at komkon.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > If somebody is interested, there seems to be a very good deal >> > for a cost-effective reasonable quality IPS 24" monitor from Dell >> > U2412M: >> > http://www.tomshardware.com/news/deals-discount-electronics-coupons-logicbuy,17078.html >> > >> > I just tried, and the coupon is still working (presumably, until >> > Monday, >> > Aug.27) >> > >> > HTH, >> > >> > Igor >> >> Please be aware this is a budget e-IPS monitor, with a 6-bit panel >> (unlike its older brother, the U2411); but given its price, it could >> be a good deal. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Alex Sarbu -- Best regards, Alex Sarbu -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
