From: Darren Addy
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:11 AM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
From: steve harley
years of appeals will probably ensue, but the stifling effect will start
now
Pretty much the way I read it.
The stifling of patented Intellectual Property theft? I believe that
is the purpose of the laws that are on the books (to prevent or at
least disincentivize that). I'm sure that most of you know that
patents exist to reward innovators and stimulate innovation, for the
good of society. To allow Intellectual Property larceny would stifle
that innovation (and from that we all would suffer).
Stifling Intellectual Property DEVELOPMENT.
Corporations don't create intellectual property. They find something
pre-existing that no one else thought to patent & then sue everyone who
is already using it. And you end up paying higher prices to cover the
cost of litigation.
Patents don't reward innovators. That's so 230 years ago. Now patents
reward corporate lawyers & Wall Street banksters.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
