A fixed lens camera, basically the functional equivalent of a 1960's
1970's rangefinder, (some of those had extremely good lenses even though
they were fixed), for about $3000, doesn't sound like a great option. I
think if you're getting less you should pay less.
On 9/23/2012 3:33 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
I’ve been super happy with the K5. At this point it’s hard to believe
the IIs is going to be a cost-effective upgrade. On the other hand,
that Sony RX100 looks very tempting... -T
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote:
:ooks like it's going to be $1199 at B&H. At that price, I'll take one.
Paiul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
