Yes, on a serious note, that's doubtless the case. My Zeiss tag line was an intentional over-reach.
Jack Davis________________________________ http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/jackdavis http://www.photolightimages.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Cc: Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 6:27 PM Subject: Re: OT: Consumer Reports Jack Davis wrote: >I've always felt CR's camera reviews to be naive. >Also, don't like the idea of price being a component of the quality formula. >That might, however, explain the Carl Zeiss "poor" rating. It was about 30 years ago, so my recollections are surely imperfect, but I'm pretty sure they were dissing the image quality rather than "value for money". (Otherwise Keppler wouldn't have spoken up.) -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia http://www.robertstech.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
