Thanks for your comments, Ted, and Bruce. Just spent an hour or so perusing the gazillion things I can set to keep a leash on my images, see what I can and cannot do, etc.. Seems like a reasonable site for showing to the PDMLr's what my eyes see, and whether the camera agrees or disagrees.
Set my licensing up to Attribution, non-commercial, share-alike. As has been discussed before, don't mean a hill o'beans if some want to do as they please. I'd have to be at the dentist or doctors to have a good chance of spotting any. :) On Oct 24, 2012, at 15:32 , Bruce Walker wrote: > I concur with Don and give the nod to Sunset in the forest: beautiful. > > Given your simple criteria, you won't do much better than Flickr. > Especially if you intend to make any use of the organizing features > (like sets & collections) or the social networking (groups, contacts, > comments). 500px is "cooler" but very weak on both those points so > I've bailed. > > At the free level Flickr will only display your latest 200 shots to > others, but that won't be a restriction to you for a while. :-) The > Pro level is $25 per year, so it's damned cheap. Lifts all the > restrictions and gets you statistics. > > There are noises from Yahoo that they are going to be spending more > money and time on Flickr, but who knows. > > I think Tumblr is an alternative (of sorts), but there's more work > involved than Flickr. All the other good ones want some money > (SmugMug, etc.). > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Don Guthrie <shark50...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sunset in the forest is my favorite. Nice views. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
